In recent years, data centers have experienced unprecedented growth, mainly driven by the rapid expansion of artificial intelligence (AI).
This surge comes with massive energy demands, with more centers being built, and computing workloads becoming far more energy intensive. This not only places a lot of pressure on existing power grids and infrastructure but also underscores the need for reliable and efficient storage systems even more.
Battery technology is emerging as a key solution to address the energy demands of data centers, provide reliable backup power and enable greater use of renewable energy sources.
A battery energy storage system (BESS) is a bank of batteries connected to a set of inverters and controls. The system stores energy and releases it when needed, such as during outages, power quality failures, or times of high demand.
A BESS helps stabilize power supply, reduce reliance on backup generators powered by fossil fuels, and support the integration of renewable energy. It is a potentially game-changing tool for the industry, given the general push towards decarbonization.
These systems are designed to provide backup power for periods ranging from 15 minutes to several hours, depending on the system’s capacity and the needs of the data center. The intent of using a BESS is not to replace existing generators and uninterruptible power supply (UPS) setups, but rather to complement them and bridge potential power gaps.
Benefits of a BESS
Prevents interruptions
A BESS provides instant backup power during outages, which allows important data center systems to remain operational without disruption. This gives operators time to bring backup generators online or to safely transition to alternate power sources.
Corrects and improves current quality
These systems stabilize voltage and frequency. As a result, they reduce the fluctuations that could potentially harm important equipment.
Replaces diesel generators
A BESS can reduce the emissions and noise pollution that accompany traditional generator use.
Performs peak shaving
By discharging stored energy during periods of high electrical demand, these systems considerably reduce stress on the grid while also lowering energy costs.
Provide backup for solar panels
At night, when solar generation isn’t an option, a BESS can supply stored energy to maintain operations.
Types of Batteries Used in Data Centers
Battery Type
Adoption in Data Centers (2025)
Cycle Life (Approx.)
State of charge (SOC)
Comparison to Other Technologies
Advantages
Disadvantages
Valve regulated lead acid (VRLA)
15–20%
300-800 cycles
Should be discharged down to 70% only, then recharged quickly to slow aging and preserve battery health
Popular, but older technology
Less expensive than lithium batteries
Well-established technology
Require frequent replacement, which leads to higher labour costs
Release hydrogen, an explosive gas, and therefore require adequate ventilation to ensure safe conditions
Low tension (2 V): more units are needed to reach the required voltage
Lithium iron phosphate (LFP)
60–70%
5,000-6,000 cycles
Can be discharged down to 10-20% to preserve battery health
Current best alternative to lead acid
Lower cost due to the absence of nickel and cobalt
Higher energy density than lead batteries, which saves on floor space (kWh per square foot)
Can easily be stacked in racks, like servers
Safer: higher thermal runaway threshold (250–270°C) than other alternatives (180-200°C)
Recycle less well than lead acid batteries. Also, recycling is costly, as they don’t contain valuable metals.
Are subject to tariffs and supply chain risks, as many are imported from Asia (domestic manufacturing just starting in the US)
Lithium nickel manganese cobalt (NMC)
20–25% (mostly North America)
3,000-4,000 cycles
Can be discharged down to 20% to preserve battery health
Main competitor to LFP
Higher energy per cycle, which means that they require less physical space
Generate more heat, which increases cooling needs
Experience faster wear than other types of batteries
Sodium-ion
Market share of ~5% (expected to grow to 30% by 2030 in energy storage use cases)
2,000-5,000 cycles
Can be operated down to 0% SOC but best practice SOC range is 10-90% SOC
Show the most promise for energy storage systems
Abundant raw materials (2.6% of Earth’s crust)
Lower environmental impact
Lower material and production costs
Safer: more stable chemistry and less risk of thermal runaway
Lower shipping costs and less stringent regulations
Lower energy density, which means that they require larger cells that add significant weight and take more space
Redox Flow
<2%
2,000-5,000 cycles
Redox Flow are the only one that can be operated from 100 to 0% SOC without risk of significant degradation
Could rival LFP in lifecycles if installations costs decrease
Long lifecycle, which reduces the need for frequent replacement and minimizes waste
Many components, such as tanks and pumps, can be easily recycled.
Modular design: separate reservoirs for positive and negative electrolytes, which allows for scalable storage
High initial installation cost
Complex setup
Lower energy density than other battery technologies
Nickel-zinc (NiZn)
<1%
500 to 250,000+ cycles depending on the DOD
Can be discharged down to 30% to preserve battery health
Promising alternative with three times the power density of traditional battery technologies, half the footprint, and one third the weight
Stable chemistry, which makes them safe even in cooling system failures
Long operating life, recyclable components, and common materials make them a sustainable solution for data centers
Still relatively new
Solid-State
Very small adoption
8,000-10,000 cycles
Takes approximatively 10 minutes to achieve an 80% increase in SOC
Similar to LFP, but uses solid electrolyte instead of liquid
Reduced fire risk due to non-flammable solid electrolyte
Potential for longer lifespan and ultra-fast charging
High energy density
High production costs due to expensive materials, complex manufacturing process, and a need for specialized equipment
Technical challenges (crack formation, ion conductivity, and the scaling-up process) that need to be addressed
Selecting the Optimal Battery Solution for Data Centers
Considering all of these different factors, how can we determine which battery type better fits the needs of a particular data center?
Selecting the optimal battery solution starts with an evaluation of the total cost of ownership (TCO). It’s important to consider both the upfront cost per kWh installed and the long-term costs associated with replacements, loss of efficiency, cooling needs, physical footprint, maintenance, and safety requirements.
Material availability and geopolitics also play a role in this decision. With many components being sourced from China, projects are exposed to evolving costs, risks surrounding tariffs, and supply chain delays. And although local battery production is expanding, we should expect and prepare for changing trade policies and potential disruptions in the future.
Another important factor is, of course, battery performance, and this can be measured in terms of lifecycle, maintenance needs, and overall reliability. Data security also depends on the battery’s capacity to support redundancy and keep the data center operational even in the event of failures.
Finally, more companies are prioritizing sustainability and may therefore choose batteries that are both reliable and easier to recycle at no additional cost.
Are you manufacturing batteries for data centers?
Lasers can be used to weld, clean, and mark batteries for data centers. Get in touch with us to learn how our solutions can improve your manufacturing process.
Technical expert and consultant in batteries and electrical propulsion systems, Stéphane holds a Physics degree with specializations in Photonics, Optics, Electronics, Robotics, and Acoustics. Invested in the EV transformation, he has designed industrial battery packs for electrical bikes. In his free time, he runs a YouTube channel on everything electrical.
While lithium-ion batteries dominate the electric vehicle market, there are continuing concerns about shortages of raw materials, costs, and extraction and mining practices. Lithium production is expensive and it’s not particularly eco-friendly.
Lithium-ion batteries have been powering our devices and electric vehicles for years, but solid-state batteries are now heralded as the next big thing. But how accurate is that claim?
Introduced in 1995, pouch cells have always presented a unique design, where the battery is enclosed in a soft plastic film instead of a rigid casing like cylindrical and prismatic cells.
In this article, we discuss how they have evolved over the years and where they are headed.